简介: 摘要:目的:急性肠炎发病原因、临床症状以及保守治疗优质护理措施进行分析,对产生的临床效果进行研究。方法:选择本院2018年8月至2019年4月期间,在院住院治疗的88例急性肠炎患者为研究对象,对这88例患者实施保守治疗,依据患者的性别、年龄、病症情况以及选择治疗意愿的不同,随机分为两个护理小组,优质组:44例,在治疗中,采用一般护理的基础上,加入了优质护理干预;对照组:44例,在治疗中仅采用一般护理干预。经过阶段性治疗护理后,对两个组别患者的临床效果、焦虑、抑郁评分以及护理满意率进行调查与分析。结果:优质组:44例,治愈38例,有效5例,无效1例,總有效率97.73%;止泻时长0.84±0.57日。住院时间3.54±1.53日。护理满意率100%;对照组:44例,治愈24例,有效15例,无效5例,总有效率88.64%;止泻时长2.54.±1.33日。住院时间7.78±2.68日,护理满意率79.55%(35/44);此外,优质组患者的焦虑、抑郁评分高于对照组。结论:急性肠炎临床护理过程中,采用优质护理干预能够起到更好的临床效果,受到广大患者的满意。
简介: 【摘要】 目的 探究预见性护理应用于急性心肌梗死护理中的临床效果。方法 86例急性心肌梗死患者, 随机分为对照组和观察组, 每组43例。两组患者在治疗的同时给予护理干预, 对照组采用常规护理, 观察组采用预见性护理。比较两组患者护理前后抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者护理前的SDS评分与SAS评分分别为(70.6±3.6)、(68.3±2.9)分, 护理后分别为(51.6±1.6)、(50.1±3.2)分;对照组患者护理前的SDS评分与SAS评分分别为(71.3±2.6)、(69.4±2.7)分, 护理后分别为(64.3±4.1)、(60.1±1.9)分。护理前, 两组患者的SDS评分与SAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后, 观察组患者的SDS评分与SAS评分均明显优于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P
简介: 【摘要】 目的 探究预见性护理应用于急性心肌梗死护理中的临床效果。方法 86例急性心肌梗死患者, 随机分为对照组和观察组, 每组 43例。两组患者在治疗的同时给予护理干预, 对照组采用常规护理, 观察组采用预见性护理。比较两组患者护理前后抑郁自评量表( SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表( SAS)评分及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者护理前的 SDS评分与 SAS评分分别为( 70.6±3.6)、( 68.3±2.9)分, 护理后分别为( 51.6±1.6)、( 50.1±3.2)分 ;对照组患者护理前的 SDS评分与 SAS评分分别为( 71.3±2.6)、( 69.4±2.7)分, 护理后分别为( 64.3±4.1)、( 60.1±1.9)分。护理前, 两组患者的 SDS评分与 SAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05) ;护理后, 观察组患者的 SDS评分与 SAS评分均明显优于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。观察组患者中出现心律失常 1例( 2.33%), 心力衰竭 2例( 4.65%) ;对照组患者中出现心律失常 4例( 9.30%), 心力衰竭 3例( 6.98%), 休克 3例( 6.98%) ;观察组患者的并发症发生率 6.98%显著低于对照组的 23.26%, 差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 预见性护理应用于急性心肌梗死护理, 能调整患者的消极心理状态, 减少并发症的发生, 值得在临床上推广应用。 【关键词】 预见性护理 ;急性心肌梗死 ;并发症 [Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical effect of predictive nursing in acute myocardial infarction. Methods 86 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 43 cases in each group. The patients in the two groups were given nursing intervention at the same time of treatment, the control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given predictive nursing. The SDS, SAS and complications of the two groups were compared before and after nursing. Results the scores of SDS and SAS in the observation group were (70.6 ± 3.6), (68.3 ± 2.9) before nursing, and (51.6 ± 1.6), (50.1 ± 3.2) after nursing. The scores of SDS and SAS in the control group were (71.3 ± 2.6), (69.4 ± 2.7) before nursing, and (64.3 ± 4.1), (60.1 ± 1.9) after nursing. Before nursing, there was no significant difference in SDS score and SAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05); after nursing, the SDS score and SAS score of the observation group were significantly better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). In the observation group, there were 1 case of arrhythmia (2.33%), 2 cases of heart failure (4.65%); in the control group, there were 4 cases of arrhythmia (9.30%), 3 cases of heart failure (6.98%), 3 cases of shock (6.98%); in the observation group, the incidence of complications was 6.98%, which was significantly lower than 23.26% in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion the application of predictive nursing in the nursing of acute myocardial infarction can adjust the negative psychological state of patients and reduce the occurrence of complications, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
简介:摘要 目的 分析对老年重症肺炎合并心力衰竭患者开展循证护理的价值。方法 以我院收治的老年重症肺炎合并心力衰竭患者为观察对象,从中抽取46例纳入此次研究,研究时间范围:2022.10-2023.10,并依据随机法行分组处理,设置组别为对照组(常规护理)、观察组(循证护理),对比两组不同的护理价值。结果 心功能指标,护理前对比无明显差异性(p>0.05),护理后对比差异显著(p<0.05),其中观察组的各指标改善更优;护理满意度,观察组较高,对照组较低,两组对比差异显著(p<0.05)。结论 对老年重症肺炎合并心力衰竭患者实施循证护理的价值显著,可推广。
简介:[摘要]目的:在糖尿病患者急性心梗后运用预见性护理,分析其效果对患者病情预后的影响。方法:选取2020年6月~2020年12月我院CCU收治的60例急性心梗的糖尿病患者,随机分为两组,对照组采用常规急性心梗的糖尿病患者护理方法,实验组运用预见性护理,通过观察4项数据,患者并发症发生率、患者满意度、医生对护士工作满意率、护士满意度进行分析。结果:实验组护理效果明显,各项满意度提高。结论:预见性护理在糖尿病患者急性心梗后减少并发症提高各项满意度。
简介:【摘要】目的:研究分析肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者护理中护理干预的应用价值。方法:选取 2018年 2月至 2020年 1月我院 84例肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者临床资料进行研究分析,并随机将其分为治疗组( 42例)和对照组( 42例),对采用不同护理措施进行护理患者的临床护理效果进行对比分析。结果:对比两组患者止血时间、住院时间及再出血复发率,治疗组患者止血时间、住院时间及再出血复发率均显著低于对照组患者的,有统计学意义( P<0.05);对比两组患者出现便秘及肝性脑病发生率,治疗组患者出现便秘及肝性脑病发生率均显著低于对照组患者的,有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:护理干预在肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者护理中具有显著效果,可有效提高患者临床治疗效果,改善患者临床症状。 【关键词】肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者;护理干预;临床应用价值 [Abstract] Objective: To study and analyze the application value of nursing intervention in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: the clinical data of 84 patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in our hospital from February 2018 to January 2020 were selected for research and analysis, and they were randomly divided into treatment group (42 cases) and control group (42 cases), and the clinical nursing effects of different nursing measures were compared and analyzed. Results: comparing the hemostatic time, hospitalization time and rebleeding recurrence rate of the two groups, the hemostatic time, hospitalization time and rebleeding recurrence rate of the treatment group were significantly lower than those of the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05); the incidence of constipation and hepatic encephalopathy in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05) There was statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: nursing intervention in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding has significant effect, can effectively improve the clinical treatment effect of patients, improve the clinical symptoms of patients.
简介:摘要:目的 探讨螺内酯联合基础治疗对老年冠心病心衰患者心功能、血浆脑钠肽(BNP)以及炎性因子水平的影响。方法 本研究以92例患者作为研究对象,疾病类型:冠心病心衰,选例时间:2020年5月~2021年7月,分组:对照组、观察组,每组46例,分组依据:随机数字表法。对照组采用常规基础治疗,观察组在常规护理的基础上联合螺内酯治疗,两组均持续治疗6个月。比较两组患者治疗6个月后临床疗效、治疗前、治疗6个月后心功能、血浆BNP、炎性因子水平及治疗期间不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗6个月后,对照、观察组临床总有效率分别为78.26%、93.48%,前者更低,差异具备统计学意义,P
简介: 【摘要】目的:探讨分析乳腺癌患者植入式中心静脉输液港护理中优质护理效果。方法:选取2017年11月~2019年11月在我院外科确诊为乳腺癌患者30例作为研究对象,所有患者均采用植入式中心静脉输液港治疗,将其分为对照组与实验组,各15例。其中对照组采用常规护理模式,实验组采用预见性护理模式,对比分析两组患者临床护理质量。结果:实验组临床护理满意度显著优于对照组,且对照组临床不良反应高于实验组,差异有统计学意义(P