简介:摘要目的探究综合护理管理在不稳定心绞痛治疗的应用价值。方法选择于2016年8月至2017年8月进入我院心内科治疗的118例不稳定心绞痛患者为研究主体对象,利用双盲法将所有患者划分为对照组及观察组,各组59例;对照组患者实行常规护理管理,观察组患者实行综合护理管理,对比2组患者的心绞痛发作情况。结果经护理,对照组心绞痛量表评分、周发作次数、平均发作时间及护理满意度各项指标与观察组相比差异较为明显,2组数据比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不稳定心绞痛实行综合护理管理的效果良好,不止能减少发作次数及发作时间缓解临床症状,更提高护理满意度,值得在临床护理领域中使用及推广。
简介: 【摘要】 目的 研究分析稳定型心绞痛( SA)与不稳定型心绞痛( UA)药物治疗的差异及临床意义。方法 此次研究的对象是选择 2017年 1月~ 2019年 10月期间 180例进行心绞痛治疗的患者,将其临床资料进行回顾性分析,并根据表现类型不同分为稳定组和不稳定组, 各 90例。两组患者均采用美托洛尔治疗。比较两组患者心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率。结果 稳定组心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率分别为 71.11%、 67.78%和 73.33%, 不稳定组分别为 87.78%、 85.56%和 90.00%。不稳定组心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率均高于稳定组, 差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 美托洛尔胶囊更适合于 UA, 可以有效降血脂, 改善心电图, 缓解心绞痛症状, 提高中医证候积分, 值得在 UA中推广使用。 【关键词】 稳定型心绞痛;不稳定型心绞痛;药物治疗;临床意义 [Abstract] Objective To study and analyze the difference and clinical significance of drug treatment between stable angina (SA) and unstable angina (UA). Methods 180 patients with angina pectoris from January 2017 to October 2019 were selected in this study, and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. According to different manifestations, they were divided into stable group and unstable group, 90 cases each. Both groups were treated with metoprolol. The total effective rate of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes were compared between the two groups. Results the total effective rates of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes were 71.11%, 67.78% and 73.33% in stable group, 87.78%, 85.56% and 90.00% in unstable group, respectively. The total effective rates of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes in the unstable group were higher than those in the stable group (P < 0.05). Conclusion metoprolol capsule is more suitable for UA. It can effectively reduce blood lipid, improve ECG, relieve angina symptoms, and improve TCM syndrome score. It is worth popularizing in UA.