简介:本文介绍了神户大学的“法经联合研究”(Econo-LegalStudies)项目的基本思路,指出其不同于以往“法与经济学”研究的特性。在此基础上,运用卢曼的社会系统理论,从法官群体和案件受理等方面深入分析了日本法律系统的封闭性,以及改变这种封闭性的困难。这具体表现为法律研究生制度改革的顿挫,还有“诉讼爆炸”预期的落空。本文还通过“定期租赁权”论争等事例,指出经济学者与法学者在认识论层面的差异。不同于经济学者总是基于对未来不准确的预测来进行法律政策判断,法学者恰恰认识到了法学可能存在的局限,强调“法”通过在社会成员之间预先设定共同谅解,来应对未来不确定事态的功能。法学者的这种思路在司法改革中可能是十分重要的。
简介:Ⅰ.IntroductionIndailylife,peoplemaymakeaprecisejudgmentofathingquicklymanytimes,butcompletelyunawareoftheirownthinkingatthesametimeofmakingjudgments.Thejudicialjudgmentisadecision-makingprocess,too.Inthisprocess,justfromtheappearance,itseemsthattheconclusionformedafterthedockingbetweentherealityandthenorm,whichsubsumesthefactsintothenorms,andcarriesoutmulti-frequencysimilardampedwave[1]'Hin-undHerwanderndesBlickes'[2]betweenthenormsandthereality.
简介:Managementoftheunderstorylandisaneconomicformtodevelopcultivationandbreedinginmakinguseoftheforestecologicalenvironment.Itisalsoanimportantmeanstoincreasetheincomeofforestfarmersintheforestryregionsafterthereformofforestryrealrights.Thispaperinvestigatedthemanagementstatusofunderstoryland,andanalyzedtheimpactsanddestructionofitsimpropermanagementupontheforestecologyenvironment.Themanagementrightoftheunderstorylandisarestrictedrightofproperty,becausethemanagementisrelatedtotheecologyprotectionofforestandwoodland.Inadditiontoprivatepropertyrights,itshouldalsocomplywiththearrangementofnationalforestmanagement.Therefore,whileencouraginganddevelopingtheunderstorylandmanagement,it’simportanttoestablishalegalsystemforexecutingthemanagementrights,andthemanagementoftheunderstorylandshouldbeincludedinthescopeoftheforestrymanagement.
简介:AnewplatformoflawsandregulationsrelatedtotheprotectionandenforcementofintellectualpropertywasinauguratedinChinaonJuly9,2009.SeniorOfficialsfromtheMinistryofCommerce,theDelegationoftheEuropeanCommissiontoChinatogetherwithsenioracademicsfromPekingUniversityattendedtheconferenceandintroducedtheoperation.
简介:Theenterprisecoordinatessocialresources,whichchangesthedialoguebetweenhumanandtheenviron-mentintothatbetweenenterpriseandenvironment.Theprofit-makingcharacterofenterpriseleadstotheabandon-mentofenvironmentalethics.Enterprise,whichhasthecapabilitytosolveenvironmentalproblems,however,lacksthemotivetodoit.Ithascontrollingpoweroversocietyandshouldassumetheresponsibilityofenvironmentalprotection.Foritslackofenvironmentalconscience,theexternalinstitutionalarrangementsshouldbemadeforenterprise.Thestrategyforenvironmentalcostshouldbedesignedinconnectionwiththeinterestorientationofen-terprise.Andvariouslegalmeasuresinconstitutionallaw,sociallaw,civillaw,administrativelawandcriminallawshouldbeutilizedtoregulateenterprise'sbehaviorsregardingenvironmentalprotection.
简介:Countriesintheworldhavetakenavarietyofmeanstocontrolcarbonemissionsbasedontheserioussituationofglobalwarming,theconceptoflow-carboneconomyandtheprovisionsaboutemissionsintheUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange(UNFCCC)andtheKyotoProtocol.Withthemeasuresofemissionsreductions,thesystemofcarbonemissionstradingistakingshape.ItisnecessaryforChinaasthebignaturalresourcesconsumptioncountrytoestablishitsowncarbonemissionstradingsystem.ByintroducingthecarbonemissionstradingsystemoftheEuropeanUnion,AmericaandJapan,andanalyzingthemarketandpoliciesbeenformed,thecarbonemissionstradingsysteminChinacanbeestablishedfromtheinitialconfigurationoftheemissionsrights,thesubjectandobjectofcarbonemissionstrading,establishingthecarbonemissionstradingexchangeandsupervisingandregulatingthecarbonemissionstrading.