简介：　　【摘要】 目的 进一步研究干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验技术在结核病诊断中的优势， 为未来进一步提高结核病检出率奠定基础。方法 138 例患者， 分别接受结核菌素皮肤过敏试验与干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验。比较两种检查方法诊断结核病的灵敏度、特异度 ; 不同结核病患者干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验诊断准确率。结果 138 例患者， 病理确诊结核病 42 例， 非结核病 96 例。干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验诊断结核病的灵敏度为 85.71% （ 36/42 ）、特异度为 90.63% （ 87/96 ）， 均高于结核菌素皮肤过敏试验的 66.67% （ 28/42 ）、 80.21% （ 77/96 ）， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05 ）。肺结核患者 27 例， 肺外结核患者 15 例。肺外结核患者干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验诊断准确率为 100.00% ， 高于肺结核患者的 77.78% ， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05 ）。结论 干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验方法满足结核病临床诊断的需求， 该诊断方法具有更高的阳性检出率， 并且还具有操作步骤简单、结果精准等优点， 能够减少误诊、漏诊等情况发生， 为结核病的早期预防、早期治疗奠定基础， 因此值得在临床上做进一步推广。 　　【关键词】 干扰素体外释放酶联免疫检验技术 ; 结核病 ; 结核菌素皮肤过敏试验 [Abstract] objective to further study the advantages of in vitro release of interferon enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of tuberculosis and lay a foundation for further improving the detection rate of tuberculosis in the future. Methods 138 patients were tested by tuberculin skin allergy test and interferon releasing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were compared, and the diagnostic accuracy of ELISA for ifn-ifn-release in vitro in different tuberculosis patients was compared. Results of the 138 patients, 42 were confirmed by pathology and 96 were non tuberculosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 85.71% (36 / 42) and 90.63% (87 / 96) respectively, which were higher than 66.67% (28 / 42) and 80.21% (77 / 96) of tuberculin skin allergy test. There were 27 cases of tuberculosis and 15 cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. The diagnostic accuracy of ELISA was 100.00%, higher than that of 77.78% (P < 0.05). Conclusion the ELISA method of interferon releasing in vitro can meet the needs of clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis. This method has higher positive detection rate, simple operation steps and accurate results, which can reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis and lay a foundation for early prevention and treatment of tuberculosis, Therefore, it is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.

简介：　　[摘要]目的 分析社区不同人群慢性非传染性疾病的预防控制知识、态度和行为，为后续研究提供依据。方法 于2019年5～11月随机抽取哈尔滨市南岗疾控中心辖区某社区600名≥15岁的常住居民作为研究对象，采用问卷调查方式调查其对慢性非传染性疾病预防控制知识的知晓情况，了解其对慢性非传染性疾病预防控制的态度和实际行为。将所有统计数据进行总体计算，并依据性别、婚姻状况、年龄、经济状况、医疗保障等情况对其相关知识、态度、行为得分进行比较。结果 本研究全体研究对象相关知识知晓情况得分为（39.04±13.68）分，态度得分为（4.33±1.66）分，行为得分为（10.32±3.70）分。男女常住居民慢性非传染性疾病预防控制知识、态度得分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;女性的行为得分高于男性，差异有统计学意义（P

简介：　　 [摘要 ]目的：探究综合护理对大面积烧伤患者心理行为及预后的影响。方法：选取笔者医院收治的 62例大面积烧伤患者，随机分为对照组和观察组，每组 31例。对照组患者予以常规护理手段，观察组患者予以綜合护理，比较两组患者护理满意度、疼痛情况、抑郁及焦虑情况、生活质量、创面愈合及并发症发生情况。结果：观察组患者创面愈合时间、汉密尔顿抑郁评分（ HMAD）、汉密尔顿焦虑评分（ HAMA）、视觉模拟疼痛评分（ VAS）、创面感染、肺部感染、压力性损伤的并发症发生率均显著低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。观察组患者创面愈合率、护理满意度评分、生活质量评分均显著高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论：综合护理能够促进大面积烧伤患者创面愈合，缩短愈合时间，缓解疼痛，改善患者在治疗期间的抑郁情况，降低 HAMD评分。  　　 [关键词 ]综合护理 ;大面积烧伤 ;汉密尔顿抑郁评分 ;创面愈合情况 ;视觉模拟疼痛评分  　 [Abstract] Objective: To explore the influence of comprehensive nursing on psychological behavior and prognosis of patients with large area burn. Methods: 62 patients with large area burn were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 31 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were given routine nursing, and the patients in the observation group were given comprehensive nursing. The nursing satisfaction, pain, depression and anxiety, quality of life, wound healing and complications of the two groups were compared. Results: the complications of wound healing time, Hamilton depression score (HMAD), Hamilton anxiety score (HAMA), visual analogue pain score (VAS), wound infection, lung infection and pressure injury in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of wound healing rate, nursing satisfaction and quality of life in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the comprehensive nursing can promote the wound healing, shorten the healing time, relieve the pain, improve the depression of patients during the treatment, and reduce the HAMD score.

简介：【摘要】目的 探讨在肺癌化疗患者中采取阶段性改变理论为导向的护理干预的临床效果及对其情绪状态与遵医行为的影响。方法 选择 2019年 4月 ~2020年 4月期间我院收治的 80例肺癌化疗患者为研究对象，按随机分组法将其分为对照组与观察组，各 40例。对照组采取常规护理，观察组基于其采用阶段性改变理论为导向的护理，对比两组临床护理效果。结果 观察组遵医行为评分高于对照组，护理后 SAS、 SDS评分低于对照组，两组对比差异有统计学意义（ p＜ 0.05）。结论 在肺癌化疗患者中应用阶段性改变理论护理的临床效果较为显著，可有效提升患者遵医性，帮助患者排解不良情绪，提升生活质量，有较高应用价值。