腹腔镜下中间入路和尾侧入路术式治疗老年右半结肠癌的疗效比较

　　【摘要】 目的 对腹腔镜下中间入路和尾侧入路术式治疗老年右半结肠癌的效果进行研究。方法 100例老年右半结肠癌患者， 根据腹腔镜入路术式不同分为对照组与研究组， 各 50例。对照组采取中间入路术式治疗， 研究组采取尾侧入路术式治疗。对比两组患者的基本手术指标、术后并发症发生情况。结果 两组患者住院时间、术后排气时间对比差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05） ;研究组患者手术时间（ 177.54±15.17） min短于对照组的（ 207.22±16.15） min， 术中出血量（ 101.44±12.75） ml少于对照组的（ 119.59±15.34） ml， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。研究组患者术后并发症发生率为 14.00%， 与对照组的 22.00%对比差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。结论 老年右半结肠癌患者更适合使用腹腔镜下尾侧入路进行治疗， 不仅可以缩短手术时间， 减少出血量， 而且还能降低并发症发生率， 具有较高的价值， 建议在临床上推广使用。  　　【关键词】 右半结肠癌 ;腹腔镜 ;中间入路 ;尾侧入路  　　 [Abstract] Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic middle approach and caudal approach in the treatment of right colon cancer in the elderly. Methods 100 elderly patients with right colon cancer were divided into the control group and the study group according to different laparoscopic approaches, 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated by the middle approach and the study group by the caudal approach. The basic operation indexes and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Results there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of the study group (177.54 ± 15.17) min was shorter than that of the control group (207.22 ± 16.15) min, and the intraoperative bleeding volume (101.44 ± 12.75) ml was less than that of the control group (119.59 ± 15.34) ml, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion laparoscopic caudal approach is more suitable for the elderly patients with right colon cancer. It can not only shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding, but also reduce the incidence of complications. It has a high value. It is recommended to be widely used in clinical practice.

• 作者: 于淑华
• 出处: 《世界复合医学》 2020年3期
• 分类: [医药卫生][临床医学]